Pinsight

Pinsight

  • Solutions
    • Hiring
    • Development
    • Succession Planning
  • Platform
    • Virtual Assessment Center
    • SimManager
    • People Analytics
  • Resources
    • Latest Research
    • Knowledge Base
    • Blog
    • Success Stories
    • Webinars & Events
    • About Us
  • Request a Demo
  • Sign In
Previous PostNext Post

3 Things to Consider When Choosing an Executive Assessment

Executive assessments are typically used for hiring, promotion, and succession planning for higher-level leadership roles, such as Director and above. Unlike assessments used for non-managerial positions, most executive assessments involve a live human assessor, who is usually a trained psychologist. Three types of executive assessments are most common: 1-on-1 assessment, in-person simulation, and virtual simulation.

The 1-on-1 assessment usually consists of an in-depth interview with a single consultant who integrates their observations with results from several psychometric tests and writes a report. The in-person simulation is usually a full day of assessment activities, such as role-plays, group discussions, and presentations that multiple assessors rate/score; assessors then meet to integrate their ratings and write a report.

The virtual simulation usually consists of a smaller set of assessment activities like role-plays and presentations conducted online, and algorithms are used to combine ratings from multiple assessors and psychometric tests to generate various analytics.

How do these three types of executive assessment stack up?

1. Predictive Power

The higher the predictive power, the more accurate the assessment, and the better your decision. A recent compilation of multiple research studies found that the predictive power of 1-on-1 assessment varies widely and is moderate at best. In contrast, another comprehensive review of research found that simulation assessments show high levels of predictive power. Based on these research findings, one should opt for simulation assessments whenever the accuracy of the assessment is paramount.  

2. Potential for Bias

Unconscious bias is just that – unconscious, and even trained psychologists often struggle to

turn it off. That is why relying on the judgment of a single person (no matter how much expertise they may have) is never a good idea. In-person assessments address this problem by relying on multiple independent assessors to wash out their individual biases. Better yet, research has shown that algorithms used in virtual simulations are far more accurate than humans in predicting success. 

3. Cost

The last factor to consider is cost. The labor-intensive nature of in-person simulations— plus travel and accommodation of all candidates— creates a hefty and sometimes prohibitive price tag for companies. For example, for a senior executive assessment, you can expect to pay north of $10,000 and for a C-suite role up to $40,000 per assessment. Virtual simulations are much more streamlined, so their cost is significantly lower, on average around $3,000 per assessment.

1-on-1 Assessment In-person Simulation Virtual Simulation
DescriptionSingle consultant interview and psychometric tests. Consultant integrates findings and writes a narrative report.Multiple assessors rate a full day of in-person activities, such as role-plays, group discussions, and presentations, etc., that multiple assessors rate. Assessors integrate ratings and write a report.“3 hours-in-the-life” virtual simulation with live role-plays. Algorithms combine observations from multiple assessors and psychometrics to generate sophisticated people analytics.
Predictive PowerMediumHighHigh
Potential for BiasHighMediumLow
CostHighHighLow

Selecting a proper assessment for your executive hires is essential. The three things you should consider are predictive power, the potential for bias, and cost. Virtual simulations offer the highest value – the highest predictive power at the lowest price based on these criteria. Go here to find out more about virtual simulations for executives offered by Pinsight.

‹ Previous PostNext Post ›

About the Author

Martin Lanik
Martin Lanik

Leadership Team

Fairness is Martin’s driving principle that is reflected in his life philosophy: the power and status that come with leadership roles should be awarded based on merit and not based on what people look like or where they come from. Martin has dedicated his career to creating solutions that help business leaders place the most capable people in leadership positions, where they can have the greatest positive impact on employees’ well-being, business performance, our communities, and the society at large. With a background in Industrial/Organizational Psychology, Martin leads research and innovation for Pinsight. By combining his scientific mind with straightforward practicality and a relentless bias for action, his teams build the best talent solutions for the leaders of today and tomorrow.

You Might Also Like

Blog| 03/15/21

4 Things Online Assessment Centers Can Do for Your Business

by Martin Lanik

Keep Reading
Blog| 02/16/21

Top 10 Things You Need to Know About Virtual Leadership Simulations

by Michelle Brown

Keep Reading
2020 11 10 Featured
Blog| 11/10/20

The Pitfalls of Standalone Personality Assessments

by Amy Huber

Keep Reading

Pioneer change, start today

Get Started

Pinsight

Our Solutions

  • Hiring
  • Development
  • Succession Planning

Our Platform

  • Virtual Assessment Center
  • SimManager
  • People Analytics

Company

  • About Us
  • Data Security
  • Request a Demo

Resources

  • Blog
  • Publications
  • Success Stories
  • Podcasts/Webinars
  • Knowledge Base
  • Customer Support
Copyright Pinsight 2023
  • Data Security and Privacy